man works on laptop in cubicle

On January 10, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a final rule, significantly impacting the classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This rule aims to clarify and streamline the criteria for determining a worker’s status, addressing a longstanding issue of misclassification that affects rights to minimum wage, overtime pay, and other protections. Understanding this rule is important for both employers and workers, as it influences key aspects of employment, including wage laws and job security.

Background of the Final Rule on Employee or Independent Contractor Classification

The rule issued by the U.S. Department of Labor addresses a critical challenge in the labor market: the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. This misclassification has been a persistent issue, undermining workers’ rights to fair wages and overtime pay. It also facilitates wage theft and allows certain employers to gain unfair advantages over competitors who adhere to legal standards. According to Acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su, “Misclassifying employees as independent contractors is a serious issue that deprives workers of basic rights and protections,” highlighting the new rule’s significance. By clarifying the criteria for worker classification, this rule aims to ensure fair treatment in the workforce and uphold the integrity of employment laws.

Key Aspects of the Final Rule

The newly issued rule brings significant clarity to the criteria used for classifying workers as either employees or independent contractors under the FLSA. Central to this rule is the reinstatement of the multifactor analysis, a method that has been a judicial standard for decades. This analysis evaluates various aspects of the work relationship, ensuring a comprehensive assessment of a worker’s status. 

The rule outlines six key factors for this analysis that collectively guide the determination of a worker’s classification, aiming to provide consistency and protect essential worker rights. These factors constitute an “economic reality test” which aims to analyze the reality of the working relationship in determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor. This approach ensures a more nuanced and accurate assessment of employment relationships.

Impact of the Final Rule

The impact of the Final Rule on classifying employees and independent contractors is far-reaching and transformative. For workers, it offers enhanced protections, ensuring they are properly classified and thereby eligible for appropriate wages, overtime pay, and other benefits under the FLSA. This is especially crucial for those in precarious employment situations, who may be most susceptible to misclassification and exploitation. Employers gain clarity and a standardized framework for determining worker status, which helps in complying with wage laws and avoiding legal pitfalls. Overall, the rule fosters a fairer labor market.

Six Factors of the Economic Reality Test

  • Opportunity for Profit or Loss: This factor examines whether the worker has the chance to earn profits or incur losses based on their managerial skill and decision-making. It considers how much control the worker has over their earnings, such as their ability to negotiate pay, accept or decline work, and manage business operations.
  • Investments by the Worker and Employer: This looks at the nature and extent of any investments made by both the worker and the employer. It assesses whether the worker’s investments are entrepreneurial, such as purchasing tools or renting space, and compares these to the employer’s investment in the overall business.
  • Degree of Permanence of the Work Relationship: This factor evaluates how permanent or temporary the work relationship is. A more permanent, exclusive arrangement suggests employee status, whereas a temporary, non-exclusive, or project-based relationship indicates independent contractor status.
  • Nature and Degree of Control: This examines the level of control the employer has over the worker, including work schedules, supervision, and the worker’s ability to work for others. Greater control by the employer suggests an employee relationship, while more autonomy indicates independent contractor status.
  • Extent to Which Work is Integral to the Employer’s Business: This factor considers whether the work performed is a central aspect of the employer’s business. Work that is critical or central to the business typically points to an employee relationship, whereas work that is more peripheral suggests independent contractor status.
  • Worker’s Skill and Initiative: This assesses whether the worker uses specialized skills in an independent manner, contributing to a business-like initiative. The use of specialized skills combined with business initiative points towards independent contractor status, whereas reliance on training from the employer suggests an employee relationship.

Rescinding the 2021 Independent Contractor Rule

The Final Rule also involves the rescission of the 2021 Independent Contractor Rule. This previous rule, deemed inconsistent with longstanding legal precedents and the FLSA, is replaced to better reflect the realities of the modern workforce. By revoking the 2021 rule, the Department of Labor seeks to establish a more equitable and legally sound framework for worker classification.

Contact the Lore Law Firm for Questions About Employee Classification

At Lore Law Firm, we are committed to guiding you through the complexities of the new employee classification rule. Our experienced team can help you understand how this change affects you. Don’t navigate these waters alone – contact us through our free and confidential online client intake form for support tailored to your unique situation.

Michael Lore is the founder of The Lore Law Firm. For over 25 years, his law practice and experience extend from representing individuals in all aspects of labor & employment law, with a concentration in class and collective actions seeking to recover unpaid back overtime wages, to matters involving executive severance negotiations, non-compete provisions and serious personal injury (work and non-work related). He has handled matters both in the state and federal courts nationwide as well as via related administrative agencies. If you have any questions about this article, you can contact Michael by using our chat functionality.